Dataset for the paper "Quantum Topological Error Correction Codes: The Classical-to-Quantum Isomorphism Perspective".
Daryus Chandra, Zunaira Babar, Hung Viet Nguyen, Dimitrios Alanis, Panagiotis Botsinis, Soon Xin Ng, Lajos Hanzo.
IEEE Access (accepted).
Results may reproduced using MATLAB.
Abstract: We conceive and investigate the family of classical topological error correction codes (TECCs), which have the bits of a codeword arranged in a lattice structure. We then present the classical-to-quantum isomorphism to pave the way for constructing their quantum dual pairs, namely the quantum topological error correction codes (QTECCs). Finally, we characterize the performance of QTECCs in the face of the quantum depolarizing channel in terms of both the quantum-bit error rate (QBER) and fidelity. Specifically, from our simulation results, the threshold probability of the QBER curves for the colour codes, rotated-surface codes, surface codes and toric codes are given by $1.8 \times 10^{-2}$, $1.3 \times 10^{-2}$, $6.3 \times 10^{-2}$ and $6.8 \times 10^{-2}$, respectively. Furthermore, we also demonstrate that we can achieve the benefit of fidelity improvement at the minimum fidelity of $0.94$, $0.97$ and $0.99$ by employing the $1/7$-rate colour code, the $1/9$-rate rotated-surface code and $1/13$-rate surface code, respectively.
Acknowledgements: The financial support of the European Research Council under the Advanced Fellow Grant, that of the Royal Society’s Wolfson Research Merit Award and that of the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council under Grant EP/L018659/1 is gratefully acknowledged. The use of the IRIDIS High Performance Computing Facility at the University of Southampton is also acknowledged.
*QTECC-fig-08.fig correponds to the Figure 8 in the manuscript.
*QTECC-fig-09.fig correponds to the Figure 9 in the manuscript.
*QTECC-fig-14.fig correponds to the Figure 14 in the manuscript.
*QTECC-fig-15.fig correponds to the Figure 15 in the manuscript.
*QTECC-fig-18a.fig correponds to the Figure 18a in the manuscript.
*QTECC-fig-18b.fig correponds to the Figure 18b in the manuscript.
*QTECC-fig-18c.fig correponds to the Figure 18c in the manuscript.
*QTECC-fig-18d.fig correponds to the Figure 18d in the manuscript.
*QTECC-fig-19a.fig correponds to the Figure 19a in the manuscript.
*QTECC-fig-19b.fig correponds to the Figure 19b in the manuscript.
*QTECC-fig-19c.fig correponds to the Figure 19c in the manuscript.
*QTECC-fig-19d.fig correponds to the Figure 19d in the manuscript.
*QTECC-fig-20a.fig correponds to the Figure 20a in the manuscript.
*QTECC-fig-20b.fig correponds to the Figure 20b in the manuscript.
*QTECC-fig-20c.fig correponds to the Figure 20c in the manuscript.
*QTECC-fig-20d.fig correponds to the Figure 20d in the manuscript.
*QTECC-fig-21.fig correponds to the Figure 21 in the manuscript.
*QTECC-fig-22a.fig correponds to the Figure 22a in the manuscript.
*QTECC-fig-22b.fig correponds to the Figure 22b in the manuscript.
*QTECC-fig-22c.fig correponds to the Figure 22c in the manuscript.
*QTECC-fig-22d.fig correponds to the Figure 22d in the manuscript.